Socioeconomic and environmental profile of artisanal fishing in the Huayla river community

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62452/g3byg061

Keywords:

Artisanal fisheries, Socioeconomic, coastal conflict, environmental conflict, unsatisfied basic services

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the socioeconomic and environmental profile of artisanal fishing in the Huayla River community of the Puerto Bolivar Canton Machala Parish (El Oro-Ecuador). The objective of the research is to analyze the socioeconomic profile based on indicators of social, economic and environmental dimensions. The research was descriptive of a transversal type, which was carried out in a unique moment with the presentation of surveys to the fishermen of the commune that consists of 30 fishermen. The age range that prevails in the fishing activity is between 43% (18-30 years), and the educational level 75% have primary education which is directly related to the level of income that they obtain 60% of them have an income of 394 dollars. The Chi-square test was applied to determine significance (p<0.05) in the indicators economic income/education level and age of the fisherman/high production month. It is concluded that there is a relationship between environmental, economic and social indicators. A relevant data could be evidenced in the investigation in the social indicator that the people who live in a single home 36.67% have a range of (2-4 people per home), followed by 30% of group members (4-6 people) and these in turn live in the home of a relative 53.33% that is to say more than half do not have their own home which relates a low socioeconomic stratum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Álvarez, M., Ruiz, G., Navia, D., & Cortes, C. (2017). La visualización femenina en la pesca artesanal: transformaciones culturales en el sur de Chile. Polis. Revista Latinoamericana, 16(46), 175-191.

Chica, W. (2018). Análisis socioeconómico de la actividad pesquera en la asociación de mariscadores los isleños de Puerto Bolívar, periodo 2015 – 2017. (Trabajo de titulación). Universidad Técnica de Machala.

Ecuador. Cámara Nacional de Pesca. (2017). Sector pesquero y acuícola cuentan con su propio Ministerio. https://camaradepesqueria.ec/sector-pesquero-acuicola-cuentan-propio-ministerio/

Ecuador. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería. (2015). Informe de gestión Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería, Acuacultura y Pesca. MAGAP. http://www.acuaculturaypesca.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/07/Informe-de-Gestión-VMAP.pdf

El Telégrafo. (2014). La pesca es el motor de desarrollo de Puerto Bolívar. https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/regional/1/la-pesca-es-el-motor-de-desarrollo-de-puerto-bolivar

Espinoza, F. (2019). Los pescadores en el litoral central durante los siglos coloniales (siglos XVII-XVIII), memoria e identidad en movimiento. Cuadernos de Historia (Santiago), (50), 189–223.

Herrera, M., Castro, R., Coello, D., Saa, I., & Elías, E. (2017). Puertos caleta y asentamientos esqueros artesanales en la costa continetal de Ecuador. Instituto Nacional de Pesca.

León, L., Gutiérrez, L., & Ramírez, L. (2015). Caracterización socioeconómica y tecnológica de la producción del plátano en el bajo occidente del Departamento de Caldas. Luna Azul, (41), 184–200.

Narchi, N., Domínguez, W., & Rodríguez, D. (2018). El ocaso de la abundancia: pescadores y pesquerías en Bahía Magdalena en el siglo XXI. Relaciones. Estudios de Historia y Sociedad, 39(153), 167-198.

Navarro, A. (2013). Pescadores cucapá contemporáneos: investigación y video colaborativo en un escenario de conflicto. Horizontes Antropológicos, 19(39), 205-240.

Salazar, S. (2012). Situación actual de la pesca artesanal en Costa Rica. Anuario de Estudios Centroamericanos, 39(1), 311-342.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-01

How to Cite

Banchón Torres, A. B. ., Vite Cevallos, H. ., & Carvajal Romero, H. . (2020). Socioeconomic and environmental profile of artisanal fishing in the Huayla river community. Revista Metropolitana De Ciencias Aplicadas, 3(2), 199-205. https://doi.org/10.62452/g3byg061