Davidson’s hermeneutics: language, place, world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62452/mhh23x34Keywords:
Hermeneutics, language, triangulation, understanding, analytic philosophyAbstract
This article examines Donald Davidson’s philosophy from a hermeneutic perspective and analyzes its convergences with the thought of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Martin Heidegger. The study takes as its point of departure A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs and Davidson’s controversial claim that there is no such thing as a language, interpreting it not as an isolated thesis concerning linguistic competence, but as the expression of a broader conception of meaning, understanding, and our relation to the world. Through a philosophical, qualitative, hermeneutic, and argumentative approach, the study analyzes Davidson’s writings on language, interpretation, conceptual schemes, objectivity, and triangulation, relating them to central elements of Gadamer’s and Heidegger’s philosophies. The analysis reveals a continuity between Davidson’s rejection of languages understood as determinate systems of rules, his critique of conceptual schemes, and his conception of triangulation. The latter articulates the subjective, intersubjective, and objective dimensions within a relational, dynamic, and situated structure that cannot be reduced to an exclusively epistemological function. It is argued that understanding arises from the interaction among subjects, others, and the world, and that the situated character of thought constitutes a condition for the possibility of knowledge rather than a limitation to be overcome. From this perspective, the proximity between Davidson, Gadamer, and Heidegger makes it possible to reconsider the traditional boundaries between analytic philosophy and hermeneutics. The study concludes that philosophical activity itself can be understood as a form of triangulation through which different perspectives enter into relation and mutually enrich one another.
Downloads
References
Davidson, D. (1973a). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3129898
Davidson, D. (1975). Thought and talk. In S. Guttenplan (Ed.), Mind and language (pp. 7–23). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford University Press.
Davidson, D. (1984a). Communication and convention. Synthese, 59(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873278
Davidson, D. (1984b). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1985). Replies to essays X–XII. In B. Vermazen & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Essays on Davidson: Actions and events (pp. 242–252). Clarendon Press.
Davidson, D. (1986). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In E. LePore (Ed.), Truth and interpretation: Perspectives on the philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 433–446). Basil Blackwell.
Davidson, D. (1999). Reply to Dagfinn Føllesdal. In L. E. Hahn (Ed.), The philosophy of Donald Davidson (pp. 729–732). Open Court.
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Clarendon Press.
George, T., & van der Heiden, G.-J. (Eds.). (2021). The Gadamerian mind. Routledge.
Hahn, L. E. (Ed.). (1997). The philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Open Court.
Heidegger, M. (1999). Ontology—The hermeneutics of facticity (J. van Buren, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie, 1919/20 (H.-H. Gander, Ed.). Vittorio Klostermann.
Keane, N. (2021). Hermeneutics in a broader horizon: Gadamer, Rorty, Davidson. In R. J. Dostal (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Gadamer (2nd ed., pp. 374–405). Cambridge University Press.
Malpas, J. (2026). Donald Davidson and the mirror of meaning: Holism, truth, interpretation. Sophia Editions.
Malpas, J. (2002). From the transcendental to the topological: Heidegger on ground, unity and limit. In J. Malpas (Ed.), From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the idea of the transcendental (pp. 75–99). Routledge.
Malpas, J. (Ed.). (2011). Dialogues with Davidson: Acting, interpreting, understanding. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015561.001.0001
Malpas, J., & Thiel, K. (2011). Kant’s geography of reason. In S. Elden & E. Mendieta (Eds.), Reading Kant’s geography (pp. 195–214). State University of New York Press.
Malpas, J., & Zöller, G. (2011). Reading Kant geographically: From critical philosophy to empirical geography. In R. Baiasu, G. Bird, & A. W. Moore (Eds.), Contemporary Kantian metaphysics: New essays on space and time (pp. 146–166). Palgrave Macmillan.
Myers, R. H., & Verheggen, C. (2016). Donald Davidson’s triangulation argument: A philosophical inquiry. Routledge.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press.
Puolakka, K. (2011). Relativism and intentionalism in interpretation: Davidson, hermeneutics, and pragmatism. Lexington Books.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. MIT Press.
Ramberg, B. T. (1989). Donald Davidson’s philosophy of language: An introduction. Basil Blackwell.
Verheggen, C. (1997). Davidson’s second person. The Philosophical Quarterly, 47(186), 91–101.
Davidson, D. (1973b). Radical interpretation. Dialectica, 27(3–4), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1973.tb00623.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jeff Malpas (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas (REMCA), agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
