Institutional evaluation in higher education: contemporary models, quality criteria, and emerging trends.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62452/kmz04c39Keywords:
Institutional evaluation, higher education, quality assurance, university governance, continuous improvementAbstract
Institutional evaluation has become one of the principal mechanisms for strengthening quality, transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in higher education institutions. The aim of this study was to analyze the available scientific evidence on contemporary models of institutional evaluation, the criteria used to assess university performance, and the major emerging trends that characterize current quality assurance systems. A literature review was conducted through the analysis of scientific articles, books, and specialized reports retrieved from internationally recognized academic databases. The collected information was organized and analyzed thematically, considering dimensions related to university governance, quality assurance, teaching, research, student experience, digital transformation, financial sustainability, internationalization, and social impact. The findings reveal a transition from evaluation models focused exclusively on administrative and bibliometric indicators toward multidimensional approaches that integrate quantitative and qualitative criteria, multicriteria methodologies, artificial intelligence, data analytics, and participatory evaluation processes. Furthermore, there is a growing emphasis on strategic planning, institutional innovation, equity, evidence-based decision-making, and the strengthening of a shared quality culture involving all university stakeholders. It is concluded that institutional evaluation has evolved from a control-oriented function into a strategic management process that promotes organizational learning, fosters academic excellence, and strengthens universities' capacity to respond effectively to the challenges of the twenty-first century.
Downloads
References
Abdul-Rahaman, N., Arkorful, V. E., & Okereke, T. (2022). Academic integration in higher education: A review of effective institutional strategies and personal factors. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 856967. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.856967
Bai Gokarna, V., Mendon, S., Thonse Hawaldar, I., Spulbar, C., Birau, R., Nayak, S., & Manohar, M. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of institutional effectiveness: a case study of higher education universities in India. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 1162–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1959367
Cao, C., Wei, T., Xu, S., Su, F., & Fang, H. (2023). Comprehensive evaluation of higher education systems using indicators: PCA and EWM methods. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 432. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01938-x
Chinta, R., Kebritchi, M., & Ellias, J. (2016). A conceptual framework for evaluating higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0120
Giller, P. (2023). Quality assurance in higher education: Where do we go from here? Quality and Qualifications Ireland. https://www.qqi.ie/sites/default/files/2023-12/quality-assurance-in-higher-education-where-do-we-go-from-here-2023.pdf
Haskell, C. D. (2017). Institutional research as a bridge: Aligning institutional internal data needs and external information requirements: A strategic view. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 11(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-08-2017-001
Jonson, J. L., Guetterman, T., & Thompson, R. J., Jr. (2014). An integrated model of influence: Use of assessment data in higher education. Research & Practice in Assessment, 9, 18–30. https://www.rpajournal.com/dev/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/A1.pdf
Kocaoğlu, İ., & Karataş, E. (2025). Improving course evaluation processes in higher education institutions: a modular system approach. PeerJ. Computer science, 11, e3110. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3110
Layzell, D. T. (2007). State higher education funding models: An assessment of current and emerging approaches. Journal of Education Finance, 33(1), 1–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40704312
Lim, B. H., D'Ippoliti, C., Dominik, M., Hernández-Mondragón, A. C., Vermeir, K., Chong, K. K., Hussein, H., Morales-Salgado, V. S., Cloete, K. J., Kimengsi, J. N., Balboa, L., Mondello, S., Dela Cruz, T. E., Lopez-Verges, S., Sidi Zakari, I., Simonyan, A., Palomo, I., Režek Jambrak, A., Germo Nzweundji, J., Molnar, A., … Flores Bueso, Y. (2025). Regional and institutional trends in assessment for academic promotion. Nature, 638(8050), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08422-9
Lindsay, A. (1981). Assessing institutional performance in higher education: A managerial perspective. Higher Education, 10, 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676865
Loukkola, T., & Zhang, T. (2010). Examining quality culture: Part 1 – Quality assurance processes in higher education institutions. European University Association. https://www.eua.eu/downloads/publications/examining%20quality%20culture%20part%20i%20quality%20assurance%20processes%20in%20higher%20education%20inst.pdf
Makki, A. A., Alqahtani, A. Y., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Madbouly, A. I. (2023). A Novel Strategic Approach to Evaluating Higher Education Quality Standards in University Colleges Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making. Education Sciences, 13(6), 577. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060577
Maral, M. (2026). Evaluation model for research tendencies and performance of universities. Scientometrics, 131, 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05543-y
Mesny, A., Roberge-Maltais, I., & Galy, A. (2026). Innovative assessment and grading practices in higher education: A critical exploration for management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101307
Mirfakhraei, H., & Ghanizadeh, N. (2023). Social, Institutional, and Personal Dimensions of Assessment Innovation Adoption in Universities. Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1(4), 45-53. https://www.journalapes.com/index.php/apes/article/view/30
Posselt, J., Hernandez, T. E., Villarreal, C. D., Rodgers, A. J., & Irwin, L. N. (2020). Evaluation and decision making in higher education: Toward equitable repertoires of faculty practice. En L. W. Perna (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4_1
Quansah, F., Cobbinah, A., Asamoah-Gyimah, K., & Hagan, J. E., Jr. (2024). Validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1329734. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1329734
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A systematic literature review on authentic assessment in higher education: Best practices for the development of 21st century skills, and policy considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425
Wai, J., & Tran, B. (2022). Student Characteristics, Institutional Factors, and Outcomes in Higher Education and Beyond: An Analysis of Standardized Test Scores and Other Factors at the Institutional Level with School Rankings and Salary. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020022
Wai, J., & Tran, B. (2022). Student Characteristics, Institutional Factors, and Outcomes in Higher Education and Beyond: An Analysis of Standardized Test Scores and Other Factors at the Institutional Level with School Rankings and Salary. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020022
Wang Z. (2022). Higher Education Management and Student Achievement Assessment Method Based on Clustering Algorithm. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022, 4703975. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4703975
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kexin He (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas (REMCA), agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
