Large spermatocele: clinical evaluation and therapeutic considerations in an exceptional case

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62452/py7x8y41

Keywords:

Spermatocele, cystic lesion, ultrasound diagnosis, surgical management, clinical case

Abstract

Epididymal cystic alterations may remain asymptomatic for extended periods, yet when they enlarge significantly, they can produce symptoms that impair function and overall well-being. Progressive scrotal enlargement is often associated with a sense of heaviness, discomfort during walking, and limitations in daily activities, prompting medical consultation. In such scenarios, accurate diagnostic differentiation is essential to exclude other conditions that may present with similar clinical features. Ultrasound imaging stands as the diagnostic modality of choice, offering precise characterization of the lesion, its extent, and its relationship to surrounding structures. This information supports clinical decision-making and guides the selection of appropriate therapeutic strategies. For large lesions, surgical management becomes a valuable option when persistent symptoms or functional limitations arise. Timely intervention contributes not only to symptom relief but also to reducing potential complications and promoting adequate recovery. Postoperative assessment confirms favorable progression and helps rule out recurrence. Exceptional cases such as this enrich the clinical understanding of large spermatoceles and strengthen evidence-based management strategies. The integration of detailed evaluation, accurate diagnosis, and individualized intervention constitutes an essential foundation for optimizing care in this type of condition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altay, M. S., Uslu, Ö., Bedir, F., Kocatürk, H., Karabulut, I., Bedir, B., Demirdöğen, Ş. O., & Özbey, I. (2025). Microscopic single-tubule technique for spermatocelectomy in cases of spermatocele: a rarely used surgical method and ıts outcomes. International Urology and Nephrology, 57(9), 2861–2866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04464-8

Arora, B. K., Arora, R., & Arora, A. (2019). A randomised study of management modalities in epididymal cyst. International surgery journal, 6(2), 340-344. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190379

Baky Fahmy, M.A. (2021). Normal and Abnormal Scrotum. Springer.

Fernández-Ibieta, M., Villalon-Ferrero, F., & Ramos-García, J. L. (2018). Benign Scrotal Tumor in a Pediatric Patient: Epididymal Cyst. Case reports in urology, 2018, 1635635. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1635635

Gebreselassie, K. H., Berhanu, E., Akkasa, S. S., & Woldehawariat, B. Y. (2022). Torsed spermatocele, a rare cause of acute scrotum: Report of a case and review of literature. Urology Case Reports, 45(102172), 102172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102172

Govindarajan, N., Thirunavukkarasu, R., & Ch, M. (2022). Giant Epididymal Cyst with Absent Tunica Vaginalis. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science, 10(3), 17–19. https://www.jrmds.in/articles/giant-epididymal-cyst-with-absent-tunica-vaginalis.pdf

Gupta, S., Gupta, B., Hatwar, G., Bansod, P., & Diyewar, A. (2020). Unilateral giant spermatocele mimicking accessory testis: A case report. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine, 11(3), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.70284/njirm.v11i3.2830

Koçak, I., Dündar, M., Yenisey, C., Serter, M., & Günaydin, G. (2002). Pro-inflammatory cytokine response of the fluid contents of spermatoceles and epididymal cysts. Andrologia, 34(2), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0303-4569.2001.00486.x

Mohammed, M. Z. Y., Dieudonné, Z. O. J., Jaafar, M., En-Naciri, S., El-Ammari, J. E., & Farih, M. H. (2021). Spermatocele mimicking hydrocele: A case report in a young patient of 42 years old. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 4(5), 422–424. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V4-i5-15

Posey, Z. Q., Ahn, H. J., Junewick, J., Chen, J. J., & Steinhardt, G. F. (2010). Rate and associations of epididymal cysts on pediatric scrotal ultrasound. The Journal of Urology, 184(4 Suppl), 1739–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.118

Salama, N., & Hassan, O. S. (2022). A post-aspiration giant spermatocele in a young man: A case report and literature review. Clinical Medicine Insights. Case Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/11795476221097218

Shah, V. S., Nepple, K. G., & Lee, D. K. (2014). Routine pathology evaluation of hydrocele and spermatocele specimens is associated with significant costs and no identifiable benefit. The Journal of Urology, 192(4), 1179–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.085

Venyo, A. K. (2024). Spermatocele: A Review and Update. International Journal of Clinical Therapeutics, 3(6). https://clinicsearchonline.org/uploads/articles/1733551794IJCT-24-RA-19-Galley_Proof.pdf

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Alarcón-Salvador, J. F., Maza-Abad, G. P., & Castillo-Aveiga, A. K. (2026). Large spermatocele: clinical evaluation and therapeutic considerations in an exceptional case. Revista Metropolitana De Ciencias Aplicadas, 9(3), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.62452/py7x8y41