Statistical analysis of the link between age and ovarian function using anti-Müllerian hormone.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62452/gnhth225

Keywords:

Reproductive biomarkers, fertility, statistical correlation, chronological age, ovarian function

Abstract

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) currently stands as one of the most precise and stable biomarkers for estimating female ovarian reserve. Its serum concentration reflects the number of antral follicles present in the ovaries and, consequently, a woman’s potential reproductive capacity. The objective of this study was to quantitatively analyze the relationship between serum AMH levels and chronological age in women of reproductive age, in order to establish its usefulness as a predictive parameter of ovarian aging. An observational, cross-sectional, and correlational study was conducted with a sample of 120 women aged 20 to 45 years. Serum AMH levels were determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and descriptive and correlational statistical analyses were applied (Pearson’s correlation coefficient). The results revealed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.71; p < 0.01) between age and AMH concentration. Mean AMH levels decreased progressively from 4.2 ng/mL in the 20–25 age group to 0.9 ng/mL in the 41–45 age group. These findings confirm the inverse association between age and ovarian reserve, reinforcing the clinical relevance of AMH as a predictive marker in the evaluation of female fertility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Olivia Elizabeth Altamirano-Guerrero, Universidad Regional Autonoma de Los Andes. Ecuador.

     

     

References

Correia, K. F. B., Missmer, S. A., Weinerman, R., Ginsburg, E. S., & Rossi, B. V. (2023). Development of a model to estimate the optimal number of oocytes to attempt to fertilize during assisted reproductive technology treatment. JAMA Network Open, 6(1), e2249395. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2799935

Jeong, H. G., Kim, S. K., Lee, J. R., & Jee, B. C. (2022). Correlation of oocyte number with serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels measured by either Access or Elecsys in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles. Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine, 49(3), 202–209. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9468695/

La Marca, A., Donno, V., Longo, M., Greco, P., Cucinelli, F., Varricchio, M. T., Listorti, I., & Greco, E. (2023). Predicting the total number of retrieved oocytes following double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim). Human Reproduction, 38(9), 1784–1788. https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/38/9/1784/7226728

Manavella, G. D., Manavella, D. D., & Ruiz, O. (2021). Tasas de embarazo y nacido vivo en mujeres jóvenes infértiles con baja reserva ovárica. Revista Científica Ciencias de la Salud, 3(1), 6–13. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/7498/749878826002/749878826002.pdf

Martín Manchado, L., Prieto Huecas, L., Piera Jordán, C. Á., Serrano De la Cruz Delgado, V., García Velert, M. B., Tordera Terrades, C., & Zaragoza Martí, A. (2025). Influencia de la adherencia a la dieta mediterránea y del estado nutricional en la reserva ovárica. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 98, e202403027. https://www.scielosp.org/article/resp/2024.v98/e202403027/es/

Méndez, M., Ferreri, J., Abelló, L., & Fàbregues, F. (2024). Terapias innovadoras en pacientes con baja reserva ovárica e insuficiencia ovárica primaria. Clínica e Investigación en Ginecología y Obstetricia, 51(3), 100956. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210573X24000194

Minotti, F., Nagelberg, A., Abdala, R., & Otero, P. (2022). Evaluación de la reserva ovárica en varones trans durante el tratamiento hormonal de reafirmación. Medicina (Buenos Aires), 82(2), 238–243. https://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/medba/v82n2/1669-9106-medba-82-02-238.pdf

Monteagudo Peña, G., Álvarez Álvarez, A., Ovies Carballo, G., Gómez Alzugaray, M., & Cabrera Gámez, M. (2022). La hormona antimulleriana y el síndrome de ovario poliquístico. Revista Cubana de Endocrinología, 33(2). http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/end/v33n2/1561-2953-end-33-02-e309.pdf

Paniagua Narváez, C. A., Barros Delgadillo, J. C., Muñoz Manrique, C., & Barrientos Galeana, E. (2024). Relación entre la FSH basal y la respuesta ovárica con concentraciones normales de otros marcadores de reserva ovárica. Ginecología y Obstetricia de México, 92(11), 464–475. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/gom/v92n11/0300-9041-gom-92-11-464.pdf

Salemi, F., Jambarsang, S., Kheirkhah, A., Salehi-Abargouei, A., Ahmadnia, Z., Hosseini, H. A., Lotfi, M., & Amer, S. (2024). The best ovarian reserve marker to predict ovarian response following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 303. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-024-02684-0

Shah, D., & Jirge, P. R. (2024). Anti-Mullerian Hormone and fertility treatment decisions in polycystic ovary syndrome: A literature review. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 17(1), 16–24. https://journals.lww.com/jhrs/fulltext/2024/17010/anti_mullerian_hormone_and_fertility_treatment.3.aspx

Published

2025-12-21

How to Cite

Altamirano-Guerrero, O. E. ., Matute-Agama, O. E. ., Moreano-Camalli, M. J., & Villalva-Caizabanda, R. S. . (2025). Statistical analysis of the link between age and ovarian function using anti-Müllerian hormone. Revista Metropolitana De Ciencias Aplicadas, 9(1), 318-323. https://doi.org/10.62452/gnhth225