Legal analysis of the Ecuadorian State's obligation to address enforced disappearances at the national and international levels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62452/rmw9kp83Keywords:
Criminal justice, integral reparation, international norms, crime victims, law enforcement, judicial guaranteesAbstract
This study analyzed the legal obligation of the Ecuadorian State regarding the crime of enforced disappearance, through a legal approach that linked international commitments with their national implementation. Tensions were identified between formal legal recognition and the limited institutional capacity to prevent, investigate, punish, and provide reparations. A qualitative approach was adopted, including legal analysis and semi-structured interviews with justice operators and legal professionals, aiming to understand the gap between current regulations and their effective application. The findings revealed systematic state interference in investigations, unjustified delays, and low levels of access to justice for victims and their families. Despite legal progress, structural weaknesses were found to hinder the eradication of this crime and foster impunity. As a key contribution, the study proposed legal, institutional, and social strategies to strengthen state compliance and promote a comprehensive approach to prevention and redress. The research emphasized the need to align national legislation with international standards, create specialized units, establish a unified national registry, and ensure active victim participation in public policy. The study’s relevance lay in exposing an ongoing issue that threatens fundamental rights and erodes public trust, while offering viable legal responses grounded in human dignity.
Downloads
References
Dempsey, N., Sarkar, R., & Bassed, R. (2025). Analysing the impact of legal and procedural frameworks on the socio-cultural and political dynamics of extrajudicial killings and forced disappearances. Forensic Science International, 366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112305
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449. https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/02/Constitucion-de-la-Republica-del-Ecuador_act_ene-2021.pdf
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2021). Código Orgánico Integral PenaL. Registro Oficial Suplemento 180 https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/03/COIP_act_feb-2021.pdf
Guerrero Jaramillo, J. A., & Pilay Anchundia, A. W. (2025). La desaparición forzada en Ecuador y su tratamiento ante la CIDH: análisis jurisprudencial: Forced disappearance in Ecuador and its treatment before the CIDH: jurisprudential analysis. Caminos de Investigación, 6(2), 27–34. https://caminosdeinvestigacion.tecnologicopichincha.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/ci/article/view/92
Martín Molina, C., Castellanos, D., Baena, A., Salgado, A., & Pringle, J. (2022). Forced disappearances and missing people in Colombia, South America. Forensic Science International: Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2022.100287
Roman Huanca, C. C. (2024). Propuesta de lineamientos de política pública en reparación integral a víctimas reconocidas y no reconocidas en el Informe de la Comisión de la Verdad Ecuador, periodo 2010-2023. (Tesis de Maestría). Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Toro Paredes, G. R., & Redrobán Barreto, W. E. (2022). El rol del Estado frente a las desapariciones forzadas de personas en Ecuador. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 5(S1), 229–238. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/7217/721778112027.pdf
Vanegas Fernández, H. G. (2023). El garantismo en el proceso penal ecuatoriano: una tensión perpetua. Opinión Jurídica, 22(48), 1–16. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S1692-25302023000200004&script=sci_arttext
Velastegui Vera, A. L., & Zambrano Pilligua, H. J. (2024). Estudio comparado al tipo penal desaparición forzada contemplado en las legislaciones: Ecuador, Perú y México, 2023. (Trabajo de titulación). Universidad Estatal Península de Santa Elena.
Zlobina, A., Bettinsoli, M. L., Miranda, M. P., & Formanowicz, M. (2023). Back to basics: Human rights violations and dehumanization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 51, Article 101263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101263
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jairo Mauricio Puetate-Paucar, Rene Estalin Portilla-Paguay , Brayan Hamilton Chiles-Paucar (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas (REMCA), agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright
Authors retain unrestricted copyright to their work. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. To this end, they assign the journal non-exclusive exploitation rights (reproduction, distribution, public communication, and transformation). Authors may enter into additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, provided that acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal is given.
© The authors.
2. License
The articles are published in the journal under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The terms can be found at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en
This license allows:
- Sharing: Copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format.
- Adapting: Remixing, transforming, and building upon the material.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes were made. You may do this in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses or sponsors your use.
- NonCommercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your creation under the same license as the original work.
There are no additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
