Los beneficios penitenciarios Vs el Principio de Celeridad. Una visión desde la realidad ecuatoriana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62452/73fnxy52Keywords:
Penitentiary benefits, social rehabilitation regulations, chrysomelid, Ecuadorian penitentiary lawAbstract
In Ecuador, once, as a result of a due criminal process, a person is found responsible for a criminal act, the penalty of deprivation of liberty is generally imposed, which involves the Ecuadorian penitentiary system. In this, respect for procedural speed, as a constitutional and legally conceived principle, plays a transcendental role. This is because the effectiveness of these processes and the fulfillment of the purposes of the sentence depend on it. Therefore, motivating this research, this topic is proposed as a general objective: Identify the impact caused by the legal process to grant prison benefits, which includes the certification of the commission with respect to the evaluation of people deprived of liberty to obtain benefits such as pardons, repatriations and semi-open and open regimes, granted by the Comprehensive Care Service for Adult Persons Deprived of Liberty and Adolescent Offenders (SNAI). To this end, a qualitative methodological approach is applied, with scientific methods such as historical-logical, exegetical and analytical-synthetic, managing to expose the procedural reality of the Ecuadorian penitentiary system regarding penitentiary benefits and their processing.
Downloads
References
Barron, M. (2012). Cárcel de Apodaca: haciendo leña del árbol caido. Revista Penal México, 2(3), 59-76. https://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/14259/carcel_de_apodaca.pdf?sequence=2
Cárdenas, M., & Vásquez, J. (2021). Vulneración al principio de progresividad y no regresividad del beneficio penitenciario semiabierto, en las reformas al Código Orgánico Integral Penal en el Ecuador. Revista Científica FIPCAEC, 6(1), 3-32.
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2022). Personas Privadas de Libertad en Ecuador. https://www.oas.org/es/cidh/informes/pdfs/Informe-PPL-Ecuador_VF.pdf
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2019). Dictamen n.º 4-19-EE/19. https://www.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/dictamen-no-4-19-ee-19-renovacion-estado-excepcion/
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador. (2021). Dictamen No. 5-21-EE/21. http://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/e2NhcnBldGE6J3RyYW1pdGUnLCB1dWlkOic2MjVlZjBkNy0zZTA1LTQ5ZWEtYmY0Ny1iNjBiNWQ3ZTJkM2UucGRmJ30=
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial No.449. https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.PDF
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial No.180. http://esacc.corteconstitucional.gob.ec/storage/api/v1/10_DWL_FL/eyJjYXJwZXRhIjoicm8iLCJ1dWlkIjoiMjkwYzMxODUtNTY0OC00MzNjLTk1ZDEtZDg0NjY1NDc5NWI0LnBkZiJ9
Ecuador. Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas y Censo. (2023). Ecuador en cifras. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/institucional/
Ecuador. Servicio Nacional de Atención Integral a Personas Adultas Privadas de la Libertad y a Adolescentes Infractores. (2020). Reglamento del Sistema Nacional de Rehabilitacion Social. https://www.atencionintegral.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Reglamento-del-SIstema-de-Rehabilitacio%CC%81n-Social-SNAI-2020_compressed.pdf
Mapelli, B. C. (2019). Algunas cuestiones relacionadas con las garantías jurídicas de los beneficios penitenciarios. Anuario de derecho penal y ciencias penales, 72, 31-54. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7059245.pdf
Montecé Giler, S. A., & Alcívar López, N. de L. (2020). El sistema penitenciario ecuatoriano. Uniandes Episteme, 7, 676–694. https://revista.uniandes.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/EPISTEME/article/view/2110
Valdez, C., Valmaña, S., & Tellez, A. (2000). Diccionario de ciencias penales: criminología, derecho penal, derecho penitenciario y derecho procesal penal. Edisofer.
Verdugo, J. (2022). La realidad penitenciaria en el Ecuador. Foro, (39), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312484.2023.39.5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sonia Mercedes Osorio-González, Yudith López-Soria, Holger Geovannny García-Segarra (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright, granting the Journal the right to first publication of the work. The authors assign the Journal the rights to exploit the work, authorizing its distribution and public communication for non-commercial purposes. The authors retain the moral rights to the published work. The economic rights belong to the Journal.
