Teachers’ evaluation in early childhood education at Pablo Montesino Cáceres School

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62452/zyc05z13

Keywords:

Early education, evaluation, performance, teacher

Abstract

The teacher evaluation is a crucial beginning point for multiple elements in Education such as: the professional teachers’ development, the students’ learning process and finally, by rising institutional quality and education in general. In Ecuador, policies and procedures are present to carry out teacher evaluation at all educational levels, except for the initial one, which has been left to the responsibility of each educational institution, without a clear course. The current research analyzes this process difficulties at Pablo Montesino Cáceres School in order to propose a teacher evaluation tool for early education teachers. The study was conducted following two steps, in the first phase a qualitative approach and the open interview to teachers were used as data collection technique. In the second phase the survey to parents was used as quantitative techniques for data collection. Hence, it is a sequential mixed study. The results display difficulties in teacher evaluation from teachers' conception until the methodology processes for needs diagnoses, the feedback processes, and the guidance training. A teacher evaluation tool is proposed for early education teachers at the "Pablo Montesino Cáceres" School.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aravena, F. (2018). Desarrollo del modelo colaborativo en la formación

docente inicial: la autopercepción del desempeño profesional del

practicante en acción. Estudios Pedagógicos, 39(1), 27-44.

Arzate-Ortiz, O. (2014) Evaluación de 360º para conocer el desempeño de los alumnos de la CyBENPR. Ximhai, 10 (5), 39-50.

Cárdenas, A., Soto-Bustamante, A., Dobbs-Díaz, E., & Bobadilla, M. (2018). El saber pedagógico: componentes para una reconceptualización. Educación y Educadores, 15(3), 479-496.

Corona, M. (2018). Método cualitativo de investigación. Definición. Aplicabilidad. Edinun.

Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449. https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf

Ecuador. Ministerio de Educación. (2018). Ley Orgánica de Educación Intercultural. https://educacion.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/05/Ley-Organica-Educacion-Intercultural-Codificado.pdf

Gálvez, E., & Milla, R. (2018). Teaching Performance Evaluation Model: Preparation for Student Learning within the Framework for Teacher Good Performance. Propósitos y Representaciones, 6(2), 407-429.

Izquierdo, E. (2016). Investigación Científica. Métodos, técnicas, procedimientos. Universitaria.

Jiménez Galán, Y.I., González Ramírez, M.A., & Hernández Jaime, J. (2010). Modelo 360° para la evaluación por competencias (enseñanza-aprendizaje). Innovación Educativa, 10 (53), 43-53.

Martínez Benítez, J. E., Castillo Cabay, L. C., & Granda Encalada, V. D. (2017). Formación inicial del docente de educación primaria y su desempeño profesional. EmásF: revista digital de Educación Física, 8(48), 83-95.

Pérez Escoda, N., Filella Gemma, G., Soldevila Benet, A., & Fondevila, A. (2018). Evalution of an emotional education program for primary teachers. Educación XX1, 16(1), 233-253.

Puertas-Molero, P., González-Valero, G., & Sánchez-Zafra, M. (2018). La inteligencia emocional en la formación y desempeño docente. Education, Sport, Health and Physical Activity, 1(1), 10-24.

Zurita-Ortega, F., Moreno-Arrebola, R., González-Valero, G., Viciana-Garófano, V., Martínez-Martínez, A., & Muros-Molina, J. J. (2018). Revisión conceptual de la conexión entre inteligencia emocional y desempeño docente. Educa Tk-Revista Euroamericana de Ciencias de la Educación, 7(1), 139-144.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-01

How to Cite

Flores-Mediavilla, M. S., Chaglla-Chaglla, H. W. ., & Suárez Monzón, N. . (2023). Teachers’ evaluation in early childhood education at Pablo Montesino Cáceres School. Revista Metropolitana De Ciencias Aplicadas, 6(2), 274-286. https://doi.org/10.62452/zyc05z13