The importance of the evaluation of the evidence in the executive judgment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62452/f9me8p41Keywords:
Executive title, executive process, evidence, evidentiary instrument, characteristicsAbstract
This article is developed under a qualitative research approach and aims to analyze through the principles and characteristics of the executive title as evidence, within the executive process, the characteristics for its effectiveness and efficiency as a procedural evidence instrument. Although the Organic Code of the General Processes completely modified the Ecuadorian procedural system, giving it speed. Being able to determine the effective importance, which arises from that distinction both of the executive title as procedural evidence, as well as, of the treatment in its own executive way, the same that must be taken into account by the procedural parties involved (from their point of view) for the execution efficiency of the respective obligation.
Downloads
References
Alsina, H. (1965). Tratado teorico práctico de derecho procesal civil y comercial. Comercial, Industrial y Financiera.
Bahamonde, V. (2018). El procedimiento ejecutivo en el Código Orgánico General de Procesos. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
Cabanellas, G. (2001). Diccionario enciclopédico del derecho usual. Editorial Heliasta SRL.
Cornejo, J. (2016). El procedimiento ejecutivo en el COGEP. O https://derechoecuador.com/el-procedimiento-ejecutivo-en-el-cogep/
Ecuador. Asamblea Nacional. (2015). Código Orgánico General de Procesos. Registro Oficial Suplemento 506. https://www.emov.gob.ec/sites/default/files/transparencia_2018/a2.4.pdf
Ecuador. Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2010). Juicio No. 346-2010. https://www.cortenacional.gob.ec/cnj/images/pdf/sentencias/laboral/ej2012/R544-2012-J346-2010.pdf
Ecuador. Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2011). Juicio 237-2011. https://www.cortenacional.gob.ec/cnj/images/pdf/sentencias/laboral/2014/R0521-2014-J237-2011.pdf
Ecuador. Corte Suprema de Justicia. (2004). Sentencia emitida dentro juicio ejecutivo por dinero No. 309-2003. propuesto por José Vicuña en contra de Carlos Bucheli, resolución 140-2008. CSJ.
Guasp, J. (2005). Derecho procesal civil. Editorial Civitas.
Quezada Palomeque, P. M. (2018). Las providencias preventivas en el COGEP. análisis y crítica en base a derecho comparado. Universidad del Azuay .
Tama, M. (2017). Sinopsis gráfica de ciertos asuntos del COGEP. Murillo Editores.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Estefanía Gabriela Vázquez-Ruilova, Alfredo Fabián Carrillo (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright, granting the Journal the right to first publication of the work. The authors assign the Journal the rights to exploit the work, authorizing its distribution and public communication for non-commercial purposes. The authors retain the moral rights to the published work. The economic rights belong to the Journal.
