Ordoliberalismo, social market economy and perfect competition markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62452/hvt7n878Keywords:
Ordoliberal, Social market economy, Markets, Perfect competitionAbstract
The objective of the present study is to make a theoretical-philosophical analysis about the current of ordoliberal economic thought as an alternative to neoliberalism, and its transition to what is now known as a social market economy, addressing one of the constituent principles formulated by Eucken (1963), as are the open markets and the control of monopolistic forms, carrying out a mathematical argument based on the analysis of the market supply with respect to its scarcity and surplus components, as well as the producer and consumer surpluses in addition to the price of strangling supply and demand. Demonstrating how the morphology of markets that best fits the constituent principle mentioned above are the markets of perfect competition, for which it is necessary that the areas of scarcity and surplus be equal. In addition, the areas of producer and consumer surpluses must be equal before any change in the equilibrium point, product of the displacements of supply and demand curves.
Downloads
References
Barone, E. (1907). Il Ministro della produzione nello Stato Collettivista. Giornali degli economisti, 2, 267-293. Milano: Universitá Bocconi.
Case, K., Fair, R., & Oster, S. (2012). Principios de Microeconomía. México: Pearson.
Enste, D., H. (2006). Soziale Marktwirschaft aus ordnungspolitischer Sicht. München: Roman Herzog Institute.
Eucken, W. (1956). Fundamentos de Política Económica. Madrid: Rialp.
Gregory, P., & Stuart, C. R. (1989). Comparative Economic System. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Mele, R. (2014). L’ordoliberalismo E Il Liberalismo Austriaco Di Fronte Al Pensiero Giuridico Moderno. Un Contributo Giusfilosofico. Ii-lex. Scienze Giuridiche, Scienze Cognitive e Intelligenza artificiale, 21, 99-145. Recuperado de http://www.i-lex.it/articles/volume9/issue21/mele.pdf
Méndez, P. (2014). Edmund Husserl en el ordoliberalismo alemán. Extrañeza, resonancias y actitudes. Universidad Nacional de Lanús, Argentina. Revista Valenciana, 13, 145-172. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/valencia/v7n13/v7n13a6.pdf
Mises, L. (1983). Bureaucracy. New York: Yale University Press.
Müller-Armack, A. (1963). Economía dirigida y economía de mercado. Madrid: Sociedad de Estudios y Publicaciones.
O´Kean, J. (2008). El funcionamiento del mercado en competencia perfecta. Madrid: Departamento de Publicaciones del IE.
Resico, M. F. (2001). Las concepciones del libre mercado según Wilhelm Rökpe. Boletín de Lecturas Sociales y Económicas 8(35). Recuperado de http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/investigacion/concepciones-libre-mercado-ropke.pdf.
Resico, M. F. (2012). Introducción a la Economía Social de Mercado Edición latinoamericana. Bonn: Fundación Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Rippe, C. (2012). O ordoliberalismo alemão expresso no ideário econômico de Roberto Campos. Revista Historiador, 5(5). Recuperado de : http://www.historialivre.com/revistahistoriado
Samuelson, P., & Nordhaus, W. (2010). Macroeconomía con aplicaciones a Latinoamérica. México: McGraw-Hill.
Van Suntum, U., Böhm, T., Oelgemöller, J., & Ilgmann, C. (2011). Walter Eucken´s Principles of Economic Policy Today. CAWM Discussion Paper, 49. Recuperado de https://www.wiwi.uni-muenster.de/cawm/sites/cawm/files/cawm/download/Diskussionspapiere/cawm_dp49.pdf
Von Hayek, F. A. (2008). El camino a la servidumbre. Madrid: Union Editorial.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Armando Urdaneta Montiel, Emmanuel Borgucci, Reiner Díaz Monzón (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright, granting the Journal the right to first publication of the work. The authors assign the Journal the rights to exploit the work, authorizing its distribution and public communication for non-commercial purposes. The authors retain the moral rights to the published work. The economic rights belong to the Journal.
